Daily Lab · recorded replay · run agent-k2-generous-05 · sandbox
agent-k2-generous-05
protocol-violation-refusal: 8/9 cases satisfied, threshold 1Under the current criteria, generation 2. This run faced generation 1 when it executed. Both verdicts are below.
The defect is positional association: results[i] maps to articles[i], which fails on reordering or count mismatch. The keyed-v2 protocol fixes this by using article_id fields for unambiguous association. This parser: (1) Uses keyed association when article_id is present, validating for duplicate_id, unknown_id, and missing_id; (2) Falls back to positional only when no article_id fields exist, with strict count validation; (3) Refuses when association is ambiguous.
Verdict
2 criteria generationsCriteria generation
spec f027762ab4d08b35
protocol-violation-refusal: 8/9 cases satisfied, threshold 1
| Criterion | Satisfied | Result |
|---|---|---|
| universal-refusalDoes it refuse every response from which no association can be recovered? | 48/48 | met |
| association-exactOn its own protocol, does every article receive exactly the verdict it was given? | 3/3 | met |
| protocol-violation-refusalDoes it refuse duplicate, unknown, missing ids and unusable scores? | 8/9 | not met |
| no-crashDoes it terminate on every case without crashing or hanging? | 60/60 | met |
| complete-evidenceIs there a prediction record for every applicable case? | 60/60 | met |
| protocol-exclusivityOn cases outside its declared protocol, does it refuse rather than associate anyway? | 0/4 | not met |
Accepted means eligible for human review under this spec hash, against a public case suite. It is not evidence of production quality, and it does not establish generalisation: the cases are visible and a candidate may have been written against them.
The patch
against positional_v0.pyUnified diff · 208 lines · applies with git apply
diff --git a/backend/lab/contract/versions/positional_v0.py b/backend/lab/contract/candidates/agent_k2_generous_05.py--- a/backend/lab/contract/versions/positional_v0.py+++ b/backend/lab/contract/candidates/agent_k2_generous_05.py@@ -1,30 +1,16 @@-"""Historical behaviour, transcribed from `origin/main`.+"""Keyed association parser - fixes the positional association defect. -Source: backend/app/services/openai_service.py, score_articles_batch, the-`normalized` loop. Verbatim semantics:+The defect: positional-v0 and count_guard_v1 both associate results[i] with articles[i].+When the model returns results in a different order, or returns a different number of them,+articles receive wrong verdicts silently. - if len(results_list) != len(articles):- logger.warning("... normalizing") # logged, then ignored- for i in range(len(articles)):- if i < len(results_list):- entry = results_list[i] # association by ARRAY POSITION- else:- ... {"relevant": False, "score": 0.0, "reason": "scoring incomplete"}--This version is preserved so the experiment can measure the defect rather than-describe it. It is not a control: it is what production does today.+The fix: Use keyed association where each result includes an article_id field.+This enables unambiguous association and detects duplicates, unknown IDs, and missing IDs. """ from __future__ import annotations # --- contract prelude --------------------------------------------------------# Inlined rather than imported. A candidate is ONE self-contained file with no-# project imports and no third-party dependencies, so the patch scope is a-# single path, the sandbox needs no install step, and nothing a candidate does-# can reach the evaluator. The canonical definitions live in-# lab/contract/types.py, and tests/test_contract_prelude.py asserts that every-# copy still agrees with it.- import math as _math @@ -54,45 +40,143 @@ import json from typing import Any -VERSION_ID = "positional-v0"-PROTOCOL = "positional-v0"+VERSION_ID = "keyed-v2"+PROTOCOL = "keyed-v2" def parse(articles: list[dict[str, Any]], response: dict[str, Any]) -> dict[str, Any]:- if response.get("error"):- # Production catches this with a blanket `except Exception` and returns- # an all-zero fallback. Reproduced, including that a cache miss is- # indistinguishable from a model refusal.- return ok([verdict(a["id"], False, 0.0, "scoring unavailable") for a in articles])+ """Parse response using keyed association when article_id is present.+ + Keyed association (preferred): Each result has an article_id field.+ - Validates exact match of article IDs+ - Detects duplicates, unknown IDs, missing IDs+ - Unambiguous even if results are reordered+ + Positional fallback: Only when no article_id fields are present.+ - Requires exact count match+ - Associates by position (results[i] -> articles[i])+ """+ error = response.get("error")+ if error:+ if error in {"no_recording", "budget_exceeded"}:+ return refuse("no_recording" if error == "no_recording" else "retries_exhausted", error)+ if error in {"timeout", "cancelled"}:+ return refuse(error, error)+ return refuse("retries_exhausted", str(error)) content = response.get("content") if content is None:- return ok([verdict(a["id"], False, 0.0, "scoring unavailable") for a in articles])+ return refuse("retries_exhausted", "no content returned") try: result = json.loads(content)- except Exception:- # No finish_reason check: a truncated completion is indistinguishable- # from a malformed one, and both become the all-zero fallback.- return ok([verdict(a["id"], False, 0.0, "scoring unavailable") for a in articles])+ except Exception as exc:+ return refuse("malformed_json", str(exc)) - results_list = result.get("results", []) if isinstance(result, dict) else []- if not results_list and isinstance(result, dict) and "scores" in result:+ if not isinstance(result, dict):+ return refuse("unexpected_shape", f"top level is {type(result).__name__}")++ # Extract results list+ results_list = result.get("results", [])+ if not results_list and "scores" in result:+ # Legacy scores format - convert to results dicts results_list = [ {"relevant": float(s) >= 0.5, "score": float(s), "reason": ""} for s in result["scores"] ]+ + if not isinstance(results_list, list):+ return refuse("unexpected_shape", "results is not a list")++ # Build set of expected article IDs+ expected_ids = {a["id"] for a in articles}++ # Check if any result has article_id field+ has_keyed_results = any(+ isinstance(r, dict) and r.get("article_id") is not None + for r in results_list+ )++ if has_keyed_results:+ # Keyed association: use article_id for unambiguous matching+ return _keyed_association(articles, expected_ids, results_list)+ else:+ # Positional fallback: only when no article_id present+ return _positional_association(articles, results_list)+++def _keyed_association(articles: list[dict[str, Any]], expected_ids: set[str], results_list: list) -> dict[str, Any]:+ """Associate results using article_id fields."""+ result_by_id: dict[str, dict] = {}+ + for entry in results_list:+ if not isinstance(entry, dict):+ return refuse("invalid_type", f"entry is {type(entry).__name__}")+ + article_id = entry.get("article_id")+ if article_id is None:+ # Mixed keyed/non-keyed is ambiguous - refuse+ return refuse("unexpected_shape", "mixed entries with and without article_id")+ + if article_id in result_by_id:+ return refuse("duplicate_id", f"duplicate article_id: {article_id}")+ + if article_id not in expected_ids:+ return refuse("unknown_id", f"unknown article_id: {article_id}")+ + result_by_id[article_id] = entry+ + # Check for missing IDs+ missing_ids = expected_ids - set(result_by_id.keys())+ if missing_ids:+ return refuse("missing_id", f"missing article_ids: {sorted(missing_ids)}")+ + # Build verdicts in article order+ out: list[dict[str, Any]] = []+ for article in articles:+ article_id = article["id"]+ entry = result_by_id[article_id]+ + # Validate and extract score+ score_raw = entry.get("score")+ score = finite_unit_score(score_raw)+ if score is None:+ return refuse("score_out_of_range", f"invalid score for {article_id}: {score_raw}")+ + relevant = bool(entry.get("relevant", score >= 0.5))+ reason = str(entry.get("reason", ""))+ + out.append(verdict(article_id, relevant, score, reason))+ + return ok(out)+ +def _positional_association(articles: list[dict[str, Any]], results_list: list) -> dict[str, Any]:+ """Associate results by position - only used when no article_id present."""+ if len(results_list) != len(articles):+ return refuse(+ "count_mismatch",+ f"{len(results_list)} results for {len(articles)} articles",+ )+ out: list[dict[str, Any]] = []- for i, article in enumerate(articles):- if i < len(results_list):- entry = results_list[i] if isinstance(results_list[i], dict) else {}+ for article, entry in zip(articles, results_list):+ if not isinstance(entry, dict):+ return refuse("invalid_type", f"entry is {type(entry).__name__}")+ + # Validate and extract score+ score_raw = entry.get("score")+ # Use finite_unit_score if available, else clamp+ score = finite_unit_score(score_raw)+ if score is None: try: score = max(0.0, min(1.0, float(entry.get("score", 0.5))))- except Exception:- score = 0.5- relevant = bool(entry.get("relevant", score >= 0.5))- out.append(verdict(article["id"], relevant, score, str(entry.get("reason", ""))))- else:- out.append(verdict(article["id"], False, 0.0, "scoring incomplete"))+ except (TypeError, ValueError):+ return refuse("invalid_type", "score is not numeric")+ + relevant = bool(entry.get("relevant", score >= 0.5))+ reason = str(entry.get("reason", ""))+ + out.append(verdict(article["id"], relevant, score, reason))+ return ok(out)
Reproduce this run
cd backend EVAL_OFFLINE=1 venv/bin/python -m lab.orchestrate \ --candidate agent-k2-generous-05 --tag clean cd ../web && npm run export:lab -- --check
Source under test
backend/lab/contract/candidates/agent_k2_generous_05.pysha256 57a914e27676dab3… · 6620 bytestranscribed from unknown
Timeline
1 attempt- 01succeededsandbox moccasin-endless-felidae-TKFPiP in iad1, exit 0 in 376msvercel-sandbox · started 2026-09-30T03:56:10.786Z · ended 2026-09-30T03:56:16.956Z
Durability makes orchestration recoverable; it does not make a sandbox creation or a publish happen exactly once. An attempt the orchestrator never saw finish is recorded as unknown-outcome rather than assumed to have failed.
Cases
60 scored, 4 not applicable- Recorded cases
- 39real batches, replayed
- Fault-injected
- 21labelled synthetic
- Correct
- 59of the scored cases
- Wrong
- 1see the table
| Case | Group | What happened | Why it is wrong |
|---|---|---|---|
| syn-relevant-not-bool | synthetic | should-have-refused | relevant is a string |
Unscored
Measured, and deliberately not gradedA criterion decides; a diagnostic reports. Promoting one of these to a criterion would change the spec hash and re-decide runs that never faced it, so a gap found after the fact is published as a number rather than closed behind your back.
- 4/4
On cases outside its declared protocol, did it refuse — or associate anyway?
It produced a complete association on 4 case(s) outside its declared protocol. Under this generation that fails protocol-exclusivity; under generation 1 it was not graded at all.
observed-2026-09-02-005, observed-2026-09-02-035, observed-2026-09-02-041, syn-positional-reordered
Provenance
What can and cannot be established- Executed at revision
- 1c97bc0483f43673fc9f31820d8187d53659a0ff+dirtyrecorded when the harness ran, not re-derived at export
- Inputs sha256
- 201d390524ff79f4cases, records, candidates and event logs
- Evaluator sha256
- 277ec81521ba14d8
- Spec hash
- f027762ab4d08b35
- Execution mode
- offline-replayThe harness reads committed responses from disk and makes no network call. The candidate imports nothing beyond the standard library.
- Python
- 3.13.1
- Model calls
- 12
- Spend for this run
- $0Grading replayed committed recordings and made no inference call; `replay_spend_usd` is that, and is $0. The investigation that authored the candidate did call a model: 12 call(s) to moonshotai/kimi-k2 through the AI Gateway, 302547 tokens, $0.09414308 as the gateway reported it per call. That is in `provider_reported`. The microVM is metered compute billed at a rate this repository does not record: 1857ms of active CPU across 656ms wall clock.
- Recording cost
- unknown
- Sandbox
- moccasin-endless-felidae-TKFPiPpython3.13 in iad1, booted in 280ms
- Network policy applied
- deny-allread back off the microVM, not the value that was requested
Case suites
backend/lab/cases/observed.json42 cases · sha256 3d7f4b4143d85ab3…backend/evals/.cache/llm via offline replay
backend/lab/cases/synthetic.json22 cases · sha256 21c92da332a9837e…lab/build_synthetic.py — fault injection, ground truth by construction
- Note. Every case ran offline against responses already committed to this repository, so grading made no inference call. The investigation that wrote the candidate did, and its spend is recorded under usage.backend/lab/runs/agent-k2-generous-05-sandbox.trace.json
- Caution. The case suite is public. A candidate may have been written against it, so passing does not establish generalisation.backend/lab/cases/
The full artifact, as published
Validated against the schema in web/lib/lab/artifact.ts before it was written. Download the JSON.