Case study
A safer guard. A worse score.
A count guard refused mismatched output. Recorded recall fell and unwanted results rose.
Shifted verdicts
August 31 scorecard tracesGiants' 53-man roster to include Odell Beckham
“The article discusses a music EP, which is irrelevant to the user's interests.”
fixture Ray · dropped at blended
Inspect story trace
More recorded examples
Mirziyoyev signs decree abolishing exit visa-style registration
“The article discusses NFL team rosters, which is not relevant to the user's interests.”
fixture Daniel · dropped at blended · planted needle
Inspect story traceWorld mostly shrugs off Bessent's 'D-Day' Iran sanctions threat
“The article discusses China's manufacturing activity…”
fixture Frank · dropped at rank
Inspect story trace
Article IDs missing
Order was the only linkThe scorer requests ordered verdicts without article IDs. The parser continues assigning them after a count mismatch.
One recorded Lab case has 40 inputs and 254 verdicts.
Inspect the audited parser revision ↗Schematic · merge point illustrative
Count-guard results
September 21 recorded experimentThe guard discards mismatched batches and retries. Reordered verdicts can still pass when the count matches.
Original, 22.07 percent, on a scale from zero to one hundred percent.
Original, 26.94 percent, on a scale from zero to one hundred percent.
Verdicts assigned by position.
The scorer continued after count mismatches, leaving article associations unverified.
failed checks
Historical working-tree experiment with provisional labels; the baseline was retained.
Experiment provenance
Corpus 2026-09-02, 10 fixtures, k=12. Reported cache misses: 0 original, 0 guard.
Base revision 3b11a3c.
Parser tests
Independent gradingRun a parser in Sandbox and inspect each failed case. Both criteria generations and their verdicts remain available. A changed scoring request needs new model recordings.
Run a parser